Let’s not forget seasoned traders and investors don’t take the Psyops (psychological operations) bait, as we are well conditioned to know that when Goldman Sachs makes a call of any sort, they are guaranteed to be on the other side of that trade.
Showing posts with label misleading. Show all posts
Showing posts with label misleading. Show all posts
Saturday, October 31, 2015
Andrew Maguire – Goldman Sachs Robbing Producers And Misleading The Public About The Gold Market
http://kingworldnews.com/andrew-maguire-goldman-sachs-robbing-producers-and-misleading-the-public-about-the-gold-market/
Labels:
Andrew Maguire,
gold market,
Goldman Sachs,
misleading,
public,
Robbing Producers
Friday, January 29, 2010
FDA integrity
http://www.ucsusa.org/assets/documents/scientific_integrity/fda-survey-questions-and-results.pdf
http://www.ucsusa.org/scientific_integrity/abuses_of_science/summary-of-the-fda-scientist.html
14. FDA routinely provides complete and accurate information to the public.
strongly agree 7% (64)
agree 40% (393)
no opinion 21% (210)
disagree 26% (251)
strongly disagree 6% (60)
15. I have been asked explicitly by FDA decision makers to provide incomplete, inaccurate or misleading information to the public, regulated industry, media, or elected/senior government officials.
frequently 1% (7)
occasionally 6% (60)
seldom 10% (96)
never 67% (660)
not applicable 17% (163)
16. I feel that FDA decision makers implicitly expect me to provide incomplete, inaccurate or misleading information to the public, regulated community, media, or elected/senior government officials.
frequently 3% (26)
occasionally 8% (74)
seldom 11% (104)
never 60% (586)
not applicable 19% (188)
http://www.ucsusa.org/scientific_integrity/abuses_of_science/summary-of-the-fda-scientist.html
In 2006, the Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS) and Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility (PEER) distributed a 38-question survey to 5,918 FDA scientists to examine the state of science at the FDA. The results paint a picture of a troubled agency: hundreds of scientists reported significant interference with the FDA's scientific work, compromising the agency's ability to fulfill its mission of protecting public health and safety.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
