Notice how government officials always blame currency "speculators" for their country's woeful finances? How about trying to balance your budgets first before pointing your finger at others?
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/0330ba78-149f-11df-9ea1-00144feab49a.html
Showing posts with label government officials. Show all posts
Showing posts with label government officials. Show all posts
Tuesday, February 9, 2010
Friday, February 5, 2010
Unemployment - don't believe the hype

Despite today's official unemployment rate being reported as 9.7%--down from last month's 10%, don't fall for the inference that the jobs picture is improving. The number of those out of work for over half a year has tripled in the past year. Based on those who have given up looking for work, of those forced to take lesser jobs, the unemployment rate is over 17% or 22%--depending on your source. See shadowstats.com.
Labels:
BLS,
government officials,
shadowstats.com,
underemployed,
unemployment
Friday, January 29, 2010
FDA integrity
http://www.ucsusa.org/assets/documents/scientific_integrity/fda-survey-questions-and-results.pdf
http://www.ucsusa.org/scientific_integrity/abuses_of_science/summary-of-the-fda-scientist.html
14. FDA routinely provides complete and accurate information to the public.
strongly agree 7% (64)
agree 40% (393)
no opinion 21% (210)
disagree 26% (251)
strongly disagree 6% (60)
15. I have been asked explicitly by FDA decision makers to provide incomplete, inaccurate or misleading information to the public, regulated industry, media, or elected/senior government officials.
frequently 1% (7)
occasionally 6% (60)
seldom 10% (96)
never 67% (660)
not applicable 17% (163)
16. I feel that FDA decision makers implicitly expect me to provide incomplete, inaccurate or misleading information to the public, regulated community, media, or elected/senior government officials.
frequently 3% (26)
occasionally 8% (74)
seldom 11% (104)
never 60% (586)
not applicable 19% (188)
http://www.ucsusa.org/scientific_integrity/abuses_of_science/summary-of-the-fda-scientist.html
In 2006, the Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS) and Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility (PEER) distributed a 38-question survey to 5,918 FDA scientists to examine the state of science at the FDA. The results paint a picture of a troubled agency: hundreds of scientists reported significant interference with the FDA's scientific work, compromising the agency's ability to fulfill its mission of protecting public health and safety.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
