Showing posts with label fiscal policies. Show all posts
Showing posts with label fiscal policies. Show all posts
Thursday, July 28, 2011
Wednesday, July 14, 2010
Irrelevant politics
http://dollarcollapse.com/articles/why-we%E2%80%99re-ungovernable/
So what’s happening? Just a few years — in some cases just a few months — after sweeping into office with promises of “change” and a quick clean-up of their predecessors’ messes, leaders of major democracies from across the political spectrum are in being swept right back out.
Did they turn out to be incompetent, or their policies wrong-headed? There’s hardly been enough time for either verdict. But if not that, what?
The answer, in a word, is debt. When an economy’s borrowing passes an historically identifiable point it loses the ability to navigate from crisis to solution. In the case of Europe, Japan, and the U.S., the range of choices has narrowed to only two, inflation and austerity, and neither are working.
When Europe tried inflation by promising to bail out the PIIGS countries, the euro collapsed, as the global markets correctly saw an oversupply of paper currency on the horizon. When it switched to austerity, workers across the continent saw their livelihoods threatened. Either way, the folks in charge get blamed and have a tough time holding their jobs.
Saturday, May 15, 2010
Lunacy
Even gold bugs don't fully understand gold's store of value. Breaking news: gold's performance during deflationary times actually outperform periods of inflation. Not necessarily in nominal terms (since prices of everything generally increase nominally during inflation), but in real terms, gold actually does better in a deflationary environment. In other words, while gold is a great hedge against inflation (i.e., it maintains its purchasing power even as paper currencies are debased), it is an even better hedge during financial crisis and deflation (e.g., the Great Depression).
Second point: since official cpi numbers are understated, the inflation-adjusted price of gold should be $6300/oz., not $2400/oz., like you read in many gold-related trades. One can also arrive at the same outcomes by dividing the money supply by the amount of gold above ground, depending on which Mx metric you use for money supply. But it doesn't take a rocket scientist to track the Fed's exploding monetary base since 2008, money supply debates notwithstanding.
And if you believe the nation's unemployment rate is 9.9%, instead of the actual 22%, I've got some US Treasury bonds I'd like to sell you (or Greek bonds, for that matter).
3rd point: the bullion banks, with implicit authorization from central banks, allegedly are suppressing the prices of precious metals in London and at the COMEX. This was considered a lunatic fringe conspiracy theory, but is now being investigated by the US Department of Justice--and the normally shiftless CFTC, according to an article in the New York Post. JPMorgan was specifically named in the article. In other words, a phenomenon a few observers who cared to examine for years, is about to be blown wide open, much like the Goldman Sachs subprime mortgage derivative fraud case brought on by the other previously shiftless and incompetent enforcement agency, the SEC. Only in this case, JPMorgan and a host of other bullion banks are naked shorting silver and gold futures contracts with huge, concentrated positions.
4th point: in a related matter, the Federal Reserve Bank (Fed) has been complicit in surreptitious price suppression schemes with gold swaps, sales and leases to other central and bullion banks, with no independent auditing, and according to Ron Paul, with no authority. That's why he wants to audit the Fed, as the vaults at Ft. Knox and in New York have not been independently audited since 1953. If the gold is there, why has the Fed refused an audit for over 50 years? And if bullion banks are naked shorting precious metals, what happens to the price of a commodity if there are shortages and there is a run on inventory?
5th point: how did gold end up in Ft. Knox in the first place? Due to Executive Order 6102, FDR confiscated all private citizen's gold in 1933. Can our government do that again? Probably not, but if they did, the black market would thrive, as gold ownership is now a worldwide phenomena--among individuals, financial institutions, and sovereign central banks. Hedge fund managers, Swiss bankers, latin American overlords, oil sheiks, and 3 billion peasants in Asia are waking up to the reality of the paper currency Ponzi scheme.
6th point: the shortage in silver is even more pronounced, as it is an industrial metal, and since it is cheaper, the silver market is easier to manipulate. When the shortage hits, and "failure to deliver's" pile up, industrial silver buyers will pay any price to keep their production lines humming. We all want our iPad's yesterday, right? Industrial uses include solar panels, electronics, disinfectants, antibiotics, biotech, batteries--any green technology you can think of. Good luck on finding it when there's a run on silver.
And lastly, those on the sidelines have missed out on a decade-long bull market in precious metals. Sure, gold was the worst investment between 1980 and 2001, when the spot price declined from $850 to $250. That's because between 1983 - 2000, financial assets like equities had a historic run of about 12% return annually. But between 1971 and 1980, gold increased 24-fold. That's when the US was fighting a war it couldn't afford, the government was running a deficit, energy prices were going through the roof, and economic growth was stagnant (stagflation = stagnation + inflation). Sound familiar? Only this time, due to compounding interest on the liability side of the Federal government's ledger, our fiscal problems are much larger. If the government were to stop cooking its books and include unfunded liabilities like social security, medicare, medicaid, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, etc., our sovereign debt grows from $13 trillion to $60 trillion (or $100 trillion, depending on who you ask). No wonder the Fed and US Treasury are turning on the printing press.
So people have to ask themselves: are the US government budget deficit and debt problems getting better or worse? And if so, will the Fed bail out bankrupt states and municipalities also--or will they just step aside and let them undergo "austerity" measures like the Greeks have had to endure?
One guess is that they will continue to print currency, tanking the dollar further. The USDollar is only looking stronger because the euro is sinking faster. You can be the tallest midget in the room, but you're still a midget. The scary part is gold is appreciating in tandem with the USDollar, and has decoupled from its normally inverse relationship. What the markets are saying is that gold is the ultimate currency, the last man standing in a race to the bottom among paper currencies. After all, the logic goes, a weakened currency stimulates exports and employment, right?
This is not to say any asset values go straight up or straight down--there will continue to be violent gyrations from central bank intervention, and manipulation by financial institutions. But due to profligate printing and spending (and hence, the necessary obfuscation of said reckless policies), the trend of debased currencies and soaring sovereign debt will continue. Solving debt problems with more debt is lunacy, but the path our governments have chosen. It's either die now quickly, or inflate and die later. Owning precious metals is the only defense an individual has in this mad world of fiat paper currency.
See disclaimer on side bar.
Disclosure: long precious metals, long gold and silver mining shares.
Second point: since official cpi numbers are understated, the inflation-adjusted price of gold should be $6300/oz., not $2400/oz., like you read in many gold-related trades. One can also arrive at the same outcomes by dividing the money supply by the amount of gold above ground, depending on which Mx metric you use for money supply. But it doesn't take a rocket scientist to track the Fed's exploding monetary base since 2008, money supply debates notwithstanding.
And if you believe the nation's unemployment rate is 9.9%, instead of the actual 22%, I've got some US Treasury bonds I'd like to sell you (or Greek bonds, for that matter).
3rd point: the bullion banks, with implicit authorization from central banks, allegedly are suppressing the prices of precious metals in London and at the COMEX. This was considered a lunatic fringe conspiracy theory, but is now being investigated by the US Department of Justice--and the normally shiftless CFTC, according to an article in the New York Post. JPMorgan was specifically named in the article. In other words, a phenomenon a few observers who cared to examine for years, is about to be blown wide open, much like the Goldman Sachs subprime mortgage derivative fraud case brought on by the other previously shiftless and incompetent enforcement agency, the SEC. Only in this case, JPMorgan and a host of other bullion banks are naked shorting silver and gold futures contracts with huge, concentrated positions.
4th point: in a related matter, the Federal Reserve Bank (Fed) has been complicit in surreptitious price suppression schemes with gold swaps, sales and leases to other central and bullion banks, with no independent auditing, and according to Ron Paul, with no authority. That's why he wants to audit the Fed, as the vaults at Ft. Knox and in New York have not been independently audited since 1953. If the gold is there, why has the Fed refused an audit for over 50 years? And if bullion banks are naked shorting precious metals, what happens to the price of a commodity if there are shortages and there is a run on inventory?
5th point: how did gold end up in Ft. Knox in the first place? Due to Executive Order 6102, FDR confiscated all private citizen's gold in 1933. Can our government do that again? Probably not, but if they did, the black market would thrive, as gold ownership is now a worldwide phenomena--among individuals, financial institutions, and sovereign central banks. Hedge fund managers, Swiss bankers, latin American overlords, oil sheiks, and 3 billion peasants in Asia are waking up to the reality of the paper currency Ponzi scheme.
6th point: the shortage in silver is even more pronounced, as it is an industrial metal, and since it is cheaper, the silver market is easier to manipulate. When the shortage hits, and "failure to deliver's" pile up, industrial silver buyers will pay any price to keep their production lines humming. We all want our iPad's yesterday, right? Industrial uses include solar panels, electronics, disinfectants, antibiotics, biotech, batteries--any green technology you can think of. Good luck on finding it when there's a run on silver.
And lastly, those on the sidelines have missed out on a decade-long bull market in precious metals. Sure, gold was the worst investment between 1980 and 2001, when the spot price declined from $850 to $250. That's because between 1983 - 2000, financial assets like equities had a historic run of about 12% return annually. But between 1971 and 1980, gold increased 24-fold. That's when the US was fighting a war it couldn't afford, the government was running a deficit, energy prices were going through the roof, and economic growth was stagnant (stagflation = stagnation + inflation). Sound familiar? Only this time, due to compounding interest on the liability side of the Federal government's ledger, our fiscal problems are much larger. If the government were to stop cooking its books and include unfunded liabilities like social security, medicare, medicaid, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, etc., our sovereign debt grows from $13 trillion to $60 trillion (or $100 trillion, depending on who you ask). No wonder the Fed and US Treasury are turning on the printing press.
So people have to ask themselves: are the US government budget deficit and debt problems getting better or worse? And if so, will the Fed bail out bankrupt states and municipalities also--or will they just step aside and let them undergo "austerity" measures like the Greeks have had to endure?
One guess is that they will continue to print currency, tanking the dollar further. The USDollar is only looking stronger because the euro is sinking faster. You can be the tallest midget in the room, but you're still a midget. The scary part is gold is appreciating in tandem with the USDollar, and has decoupled from its normally inverse relationship. What the markets are saying is that gold is the ultimate currency, the last man standing in a race to the bottom among paper currencies. After all, the logic goes, a weakened currency stimulates exports and employment, right?
This is not to say any asset values go straight up or straight down--there will continue to be violent gyrations from central bank intervention, and manipulation by financial institutions. But due to profligate printing and spending (and hence, the necessary obfuscation of said reckless policies), the trend of debased currencies and soaring sovereign debt will continue. Solving debt problems with more debt is lunacy, but the path our governments have chosen. It's either die now quickly, or inflate and die later. Owning precious metals is the only defense an individual has in this mad world of fiat paper currency.
See disclaimer on side bar.
Disclosure: long precious metals, long gold and silver mining shares.
Labels:
budget deficits,
central banks,
COMEX,
debt,
deflation,
fiscal policies,
gold,
inflation,
monetary base,
silver
Tuesday, January 26, 2010
Deficit Reduction Commission will be a bust
Despite the necessity of reducing or even eliminating our federal budget deficit in order to maintain sound fiscal policy, I will wager the formation of a Deficit Reduction Commission, if enacted, will end up being largely impotent, as earmarking will de-fang any initiatives coming out of the commission.
It's a nice gesture to fiscal conservatives, but it will be just another bureaucratic boondoggle, corrupted by conflicting special interest groups.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/01/23/AR2010012302429.html
It's a nice gesture to fiscal conservatives, but it will be just another bureaucratic boondoggle, corrupted by conflicting special interest groups.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/01/23/AR2010012302429.html
Thursday, December 31, 2009
Borrow and print
Short term noise often tends to obscure the longer term realities and the fact is that the US is now firmly on the path to financial decline unless an abrupt, about face occurs in regards to our economic and fiscal policies. I have said it before and will say it again; if all that was necessary to produce lasting prosperity was to ramp up the printing presses and borrow like a banshee, nations of the past would have figured it out long before we did and would have successfully implemented it. That those nations that have attempted to do so are now in the ashbin of history or learned enough to avoid doing so again, is proof enough that it is a foolish, irresponsible and destructive path to take.
- Dan Norcini, December 29, 2009
Labels:
borrow,
Dan Norcini,
fiscal policies,
printing press
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
