Handicapping Lorcaserin's advisory committee review

This is my attempt to handicap the voting by members of Lorcaserin's advisory committee, given they are the same panel as Meridia's advisory committee.

ENDOCRINOLOGIC AND METABOLIC DRUGS ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEMBERS (Voting)

Eric I. Felner, M.D.
Associate Professor of Pediatrics
Director of Diabetes and Endocrinology
Hughes Spalding Children's Hospital
Emory University School of Medicine
Atlanta, Georgia
* Yes on Lorqess, due to lower HbA1c glucose levels

Lamont G. Weide M.D., Ph.D., F.A.C.E.
Chief, Diabetes & Endocrinology
Professor, Internal Medicine
University of Missouri - Kansas City
Truman Medical Centers
Diabetes Center
Kansas City, Missouri
* Voted No on Qnexa, wanted 2 year data
* Yes on Lorqess, due to 2 year echo data, and lower HbA1c glucose levels

Allison B. Goldfine, M.D. Associate Professor
Harvard Medical School Section Head of Clinical Research
Joslin Diabetes
Boston, Massachusetts
* Voted Yes on Qnexa
* Strong Yes on Lorqess, due to better safety profile, and lower HbA1c glucose levels

Abraham Thomas, M.D., M.P.H.
Acting Chair Division Head
Endocrinology, Diabetes, Bone, and Mineral Disorders
Henry Ford Hospital
Whitehouse Chair of Endocrinology
Detroit, Michigan
* Voted No on Qnexa
* No on Lorqess, didn't seem to believe in drug therapeutics for obesity

CARDIOVASCULAR AND RENAL DRUG ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEMBER (Voting)

Sanjay Kaul., M.D.
Director, Fellowship Training Program in Cardiovascular Diseases
Cedars-Sinai Heart Institute
Professor, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA
Division of Cardiology
Cedar Sinai Medical Center
Los Angeles, California
* Voted Yes on Qnexa
* Strong Yes on Lorqess, due to better safety profile and 2-year echo data

CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND RESEARCH TEMPORARY MEMBERS (Voting)

Melanie Coffin
Patient Representative Rockville, Maryland
* Voted Yes on Qnexa
* Strong Yes on Lorqess, due to better safety profile

Jessica W. Henderson, Ph.D.
Acting Consumer Representative
Professor of Community Health Education Division of Health and Physical Education
Western Oregon University
Monmouth, Oregon
* Voted Yes on Qnexa
* Strong Yes on Lorqess, due to better safety profile.

John M. Flack, M.D., M.P.H., F.A.H.A., F.A.C.P.
Professor of Medicine & Physiology
Chair, Department of Internal Medicine
Chief, Division of Translational Research & Clinical Epidemiology
Wayne State University School of Medicine
Detroit, Michigan
* Yes on Lorqess, due to 2-year echo data, and lower HbA1c glucose levels. Also, half-life for Lorqess is faster and metabolized in the kidneys, not the liver.

William R. Hiatt, M.D., F.A.C.P.
University of Colorado Denver, School of Medicine
Section of Vascular Medicine
Divisions of Geriatric Medicine and Cardiology
President, Colorado Prevention Center
Aurora, Colorado
* Yes on Lorqess, due to 2-year echo data.

Jacqueline S. Gardner, Ph.D., M.P.H.
Professor Emeritus
Department of Pharmacy
University of Washington
Seattle, Washington
* Strong Yes on Lorqess, due to no teratogenicity or unwanted pregnancy concerns (see Qnexa). Formulary journal endorses Lorqess as a safe, effective drug that can be taken for longer than 12 weeks, unlike phentermine.

Jodi B. Segal, M.D., M.P.H.
Associate Professor of Medicine
Health Policy and Management, and Epidemiology
Johns Hopkins University
Baltimore, Maryland
* Yes on Lorqess, due to better safety profile, and lower HbA1c glucose levels

Peter A. Gross, M.D.
Executive Vice President & Chief Medical Officer
Hackensack University Medical Center
Hackensack, New Jersey
* Don't Know

David D. Waters, M.D. Emeritus Professor
Division of Cardiology
San Francisco General Hospital University of California
San Francisco, California
* Yes on Lorcaserin, due to 2 years of echo data

REGULAR GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES (Voting)

Dennis O. Dixon, Ph.D. Mathematical Statistician
Biostatistics Research Branch
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)
National Institutes of Health (NIH)
Bethesda, Maryland
* Strong Yes on Lorcaserin, as clinical trials had the most patients and benefits are statistically significant.

Katherine M. Flegal, Ph.D.
Senior Research Scientist
Distinguished Consultant
National Center for Health Statistics
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Hyattsville, Maryland
* Voted No on Qnexa
* Yes on Lorqess, due to 2-year echo data and clinical trials had the most patients and benefits are statistically significant

Edward W. Gregg, Ph.D.
Chief, Epidemiology and Statistics Branch
Division of Diabetes Translation
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Atlanta, Georgia
* Don't Know
* Could be a yes for Lorqess as clinical trials had the most patients and benefits are statistically significant.

Michael A. Proschan, Ph.D.
Mathematical Statistician
Biostatistics Research Branch
NIAID, NIH
Bethesda, Maryland
* Voted No on Qnexa
* Strong Yes on Lorcaserin, as clinical trials had the most patients and benefits are statistically significant

ENDOCRINOLOGIC AND METABOLIC DRUGS ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEMBER
(Non-Voting)

Enrico P. Veltri, M.D.
Industry Representative
Pharmaceutical Industry Consultant
Princeton, New Jersey

FDA PARTICIPANTS (Non-Voting)

Curtis J. Rosebraugh, M.D., M.P.H.
Director
Office of Drug Evaluation (ODE) II
Office of New Drugs (OND)
Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER)
Food and Drug Administration (FDA)

Mary H. Parks, M.D.
Director
Division of Metabolism and Endocrinology Products (DMEP),ODE II
OND, CDER, FDA

Eric Colman, M.D.
Deputy Director
DMEP, ODE II, OND
CDER, FDA

Monique Falconer, M.D., M.S.
Clinical Reviewer
DMEP, ODE II, OND
CDER, FDA

David Hoberman, Ph.D.
Mathematical Statistician
Division of Biometrics II
Office of Biometrics
Office of Translational Sciences
CDER, FDA

My best guess tally is 14 Yes, 1 No, and 2 Don't Know. Seven of the Yes votes are a Strong Yes. Even though cardiac valvulopathy has been ruled out based on 2 years of echo data, I did not include all of the cardiovascular voting members as a Strong Yes.

Worst-case scenario is 9 Yes, 8 No. ARNA shares probably drop to $3 - $4 in this scenario.

Best-case scenario is 16 Yes, 1 No. ARNA shares could soar to $15 - $20 in this scenario.

See disclaimers in the side bar. This is not financial advise, and any price or directional targets are my opinion only. Perform your own due diligence.

Disclosure: long ARNA shares, short January 2011 puts, long October calls and short October puts (bullish risk reversal spread, or synthetic long stock split strikes position).