Showing posts with label currency intervention. Show all posts
Showing posts with label currency intervention. Show all posts
Monday, April 9, 2012
Saturday, October 23, 2010
Germany calls out Geithner's hypocrisy
The finance ministers of Brazil and now Germany are declaring what I've been ranting on for years: the Fed is the biggest manipulator of currencies in the world, despite accusing others of currency intervention.
http://www.zerohedge.com/article/germany-calls-out-geithners-hypocrisy-says-money-printing-fx-intervention
http://www.zerohedge.com/article/germany-calls-out-geithners-hypocrisy-says-money-printing-fx-intervention
At the G-20 meeting, per Bloomberg, German Economic Minister Rainer Bruederle said that the Fed's "push toward easier monetary policy is the “wrong way” to stimulate growth and may amount to a manipulation of the dollar. Excessive, permanent money creation in my opinion is an indirect manipulation of an exchange rate." The fact that China was smart enough to peg its currency to the most rapidly devaluing currency in the world is a different story altogether, and merely confirms that they are leap and bounds more sophisticated in their monetary policy than anyone gives them credit for. If Geithner wants to prevent a relative depreciation of the Yuan versus all other currencies in the world (especially the EUR, against which it continues to be in freefall), the answer is simple: stop bloody printing!
Labels:
Brazil,
China,
currency intervention,
currency manipulation,
Fed,
G-20,
Germany
Wednesday, September 29, 2010
Currency intervention
Here are a couple articles on the hazards of currency intervention, the so-called race to the bottom.
http://ftalphaville.ft.com/blog/2010/09/28/354756/25-currency-interventions-in-a-one-week-band/
http://edition.cnn.com/2010/BUSINESS/09/28/currency.wars.brazil.ft/index.html
http://ftalphaville.ft.com/blog/2010/09/28/354756/25-currency-interventions-in-a-one-week-band/
http://edition.cnn.com/2010/BUSINESS/09/28/currency.wars.brazil.ft/index.html
Labels:
currency intervention
Tuesday, April 20, 2010
To intervene or not to intervene
http://www.gata.org/node/8560
That is, the story leads with the ECB's acknowledgement that it traded 35.5 tonnes of gold for dollars in 2009 in the name of "liquidity, security, and return."
Then the story quotes the bank as having "also confirmed it had not intervened in currency markets in 2009."
But whenever a central bank exchanges gold for a currency, that is by definition a currency market intervention.
Labels:
currency intervention,
ECB,
gold sales
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
