Banks Resisting Fannie, Freddie Demands to Buy Back Mortgages

It's Goliath vs. Goliath, and it won't end well.  In one corner is Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae.  In the other corner are banks, big and small, refusing to take back bad loan portfolios.

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-11-30/banks-in-u-s-resisting-calls-to-repurchase-fannie-mae-freddie-mac-loans.html

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are facing growing resistance as they attempt to push failed home loans off their books and onto the balance sheets of banks including Bank of America Corp. and JPMorgan Chase & Co.

The two government-owned mortgage companies are enforcing contracts that require lenders to buy back loans that didn’t meet underwriting standards. At the end of September, the companies reported, banks hadn’t responded to $13 billion in buyback requests. A third of those were at least four months old and Freddie Mac has begun to assess penalties for the delays.

Zero down mortgages restarted by Fannie

http://www.fundmymutualfund.com/2010/09/zero-down-mortgages-restarted-by.html

Good news folks... the "no skin in the game" mortgage is back. You know the game right? It's a one sided bet where the buyer can only win. If the house goes up, you pocket that and hopefully get that granite countertop you so deserve with the home equity. If it doesn't go up.... you walk - but only after living in the home rent free for at least 18-22 months as you strategically default your way to a mountain of savings while waiting for the sheriff to show up. If you are smart you can save at least $30K during this time. There are no losers here (except the U.S. taxpayer).

Fannie and Freddie bond upheaval

This must-read article requires a free online subscription to Financial Times.

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/3e726a68-a640-11df-8767-00144feabdc0.html

Freddie and Fannie need billions more in aid

Both Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae lost billions more last quarter and will need billions more in aid from the federal government. Gee--what a shock.

http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5i61IvzXZ9v93-0lhav_WRztb1aIgD9HG0A0G1

Government-controlled mortgage buyer Freddie Mac is asking for $1.8 billion in additional federal aid after posting a larger loss in the second quarter.

Freddie Mac said Monday it lost $6 billion, or $1.85 per share, in the April-to-June period.

The government rescued McLean, Va.-based Freddie Mac and sibling company Fannie Mae from the brink of failure nearly two years ago. The new request means they have needed $148.2 billion to stay afloat, about $63.1 billion of which is being used by Freddie Mac.

Both Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac have both lost tens of billions of dollars during the past two years and both are asking the government to prop them up. Last week, Fannie Mae requested $1.5 billion after posting a loss of $3.13 billion, or 55 cents per share, in the second quarter.

"We recognize that high unemployment and other factors still pose very real challenges for the housing market," CEO Charles Haldeman said in a statement.

Ya think?

"With that in mind, we continue to focus on the quality of the new business we are adding to our book to be responsible stewards of taxpayer funds."

Ha-ha, that's a good one...

Another lie: "No more taxpayer bailouts!"

I guess Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac don't count as taxpayer bailouts.

http://www.zerohedge.com/article/lie-du-jour-no-more-taxpayer-bailouts

The Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac sink hole deepens

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aZ7Vw70CckxU&pos=2

Fannie Mae will seek $15.3 billion in U.S. aid, bringing the total owed under a government lifeline to $76.2 billion, after its 10th consecutive quarterly loss.

For the full year, Fannie Mae’s loss widened to $74.4 billion from $59.8 billion in 2008.

The company’s shares, which peaked at $87.81 in December 2000, closed at 99 cents yesterday in New York Stock Exchange composite trading. The Treasury owns 79.9 percent of the company’s outstanding common stock.

Wow. Shares of Fannie Mae have dropped from a high of $88 to $1 in the last decade. That is some serious destruction of wealth. By contrast, the price of gold has more than quadrupled in the same decade. And with more bailouts and money printing looming, people have the gumption to tell me holding gold is risky?

Disclosure: long gold and silver.

GE and the US government are broke

General Electric and the US government are bankrupt, according to Porter Stansberry.

We've been telling our friends for months that sooner or later the U.S. Treasury secretary would come out and publicly say something ridiculous in defense of the U.S. dollar – much like a banana republic's finance minister on the eve of devaluation. Today, we got our first actual taste... On Sunday, Geithner said the U.S. "will never" lose its triple-A credit rating. Never is a very long time. And if you believe the representative of a bankrupt government, there's a bridge in Brooklyn you should look into buying...

Watching Geithner lie through his teeth reminded us of July 2008, when Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke assured us Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were "adequately capitalized" and "in no danger of failing." One month earlier, I'd written an issue of my newsletter (Porter Stansberry's Investment Advisory) titled "Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae Are Going to Zero." I was watching Bernanke's testimony on TV in a hotel room on the 30th floor of the Four Seasons Hotel in Las Vegas. I could literally see more than $100 million worth of bankrupt real estate from my window – more than enough to bankrupt both Fannie and Freddie. As an investor, I had a simple choice to make: I could believe a government bureaucrat, who is in charge of running a paper money system backed by nothing by confidence... or I could believe audited financial statements and my own two eyes. I chose the latter.

More recently, I've been warning investors both our government and our biggest conglomerate (GE) are broke. On Friday, Moody's seemed to agree with me, warning the current deficits are unsustainable. Geithner and Bernanke will undoubtedly beg to differ. However, anyone who has ever paid interest on any debt before is welcome to simply look at the numbers and ask themselves a few basic questions... How can so few taxpayers be expected to repay more than $20 trillion worth of debt? How can a democracy where most people don't actually pay taxes ever be expected to run a balanced budget? Why would anyone expect America to repay its debts when millions of our consumers and a large number of our biggest companies are going bankrupt?

Big problems like these are easy for investors to ignore. And many investors will ignore these problems – for a long, long time. I can't tell you when, exactly, the scary numbers behind GE and our federal government will cause investors to take action. But I can tell you when that time comes you won't want to be holding dollars or GE bonds. And I can tell you with 100% certainty both GE and the federal government are going bankrupt within the next five years.

Lies and omissions

http://usawatchdog.com/real-deficit-numbers-and-real-consequences/

The reason why I ask is the government uses accounting gimmicks to make just about every number it puts out look better than what it really is. For example, the most recent Consumer Price Index for inflation was officially 2.7%; but if you compute inflation the way Bureau of Labor Statistics did it in 1980, the inflation rate would be 9.7%. The same goes for unemployment. Officially, it stands at 10%; but if computed the way BLS did it prior to 1994, it would come out to 21.9%. (source: shadowstats.com)

I asked economist John Williams of shadowstats.com to weigh in on last year’s record $1.4 trillion of red ink for the “real” deficit number. Williams told me, “It was closer to $2 trillion because they knocked off $500 billion with accounting gimmicks.”

In its latest budget, the White House is projecting $1.56 trillion in red ink, and that is another new record! What will the “real” deficit be when the year is over? Williams says, “With a weaker than expected economy, the 2010 deficit likely will top $2 trillion…”

No matter how the government does its accounting, the actual deficit will have to be financed. America will have 3 choices: (1) raise taxes to the moon in a very bad economy, (2) get foreigners to buy more debt, and (3) monetize the debt. (print money to pay the bills) Williams chooses what’s behind door #3. In his latest report he says, “…worse-than-projected borrowing needs for the U.S. Treasury likely will trigger increasing flight from the U.S. dollar. At such time as that moves to a panicked level, and U.S. Treasuries increasingly are dumped or otherwise shunned, the Fed will have little choice but to monetize the Treasury debt, becoming the buyer of last resort for Treasuries. Those circumstances should lead to mounting inflation woes and flight-to-safety outside the U.S. dollar, particularly to hard assets such as gold and silver…”

There is another possible consequence to record deficits–higher interest rates! Countries around the globe with high deficits are starting to see interest rates rise. For example, Greece is facing a huge debt load and interest rates there are skyrocketing. In a recent article from “Money and Markets,” analyst Mike Larson put it this way, “Imagine what would happen if Uncle Sam’s borrowing costs shot up like they have in Greece — by 60 percent! Imagine what that would mean for the cost of car loans, mortgages, and other products whose rates track Treasury yields! And imagine the impact on an economy still struggling to recover from the Great Recession! This is the next big story that few people are talking about.”

The founder of “Money and Markets,” Dr. Martin D. Weiss, went on to say, “…unless the Obama administration and Congress can somehow ax the budget or find a new gusher of revenues — both extremely unlikely anytime soon — collapsing U.S. bond prices and sharply higher long-term interest rates are unavoidable.”

The most recent record breaking budget does not take into account what we will spend in the continued bailout of failed mortgage giants Fannie and Freddie. The two were nationalized last year and, on Christmas Eve, the Treasury decided to give them both unlimited bailout funds for the next three years! There is a total of $8 trillion in liability.

So, it looks like higher inflation or higher interest rates or both are coming.

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac revisited

Notice how our government set the table for another Fannie and Freddie bailout--on Christmas Eve (chronicled here in a previous blog), when the world was busy celebrating peace, love and happiness.

http://usawatchdog.com/fannie-freddie-and-gold/

Bank bailout fatigue

Tired of bank bailouts? The House has a 1,279 page financial reform bill which includes a clause allocating $4 trillion more for emergency funding in case banks collapse.

Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner also raised an additional $400 billion to backstop Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae, without Congressional appproval, conveniently implemented on Christmas Eve.

And with the federal budget deficit running out of control, and no investors willing to fund those deficits (except the Fed itself), they are now coming up with a new instrument in addition to overnight bank reserves, dubbed benignly as "term deposit facility." In essence, they are creating Federal Reserve CD's for member banks.

Many rightfully believe creating money out of thin air is inflationary, due to the printing of more USDollars. Another more dire scenario is hyperinflation, due to the more expansive creation of electronic currency via a computer keystroke.

In other words, the US Treasury can only print so many USDollars, as there are not enough trees. But it can certainly create more virtual currency through the miracle of computer technology. Turbo Tax Timmy's forefinger is developing carpal tunnel syndrome from all the keystrokes. Either way, the paper currency in your wallet is being devalued--on a much bigger scale. Protect yourself accordingly.

AIG and Other Insurance Companies in this Bailout

I agree with Porter Stansberry's take on AIG's near-collapse, and its financial ramifications worldwide. Here is my take, with my own edits:

There's 3 things I learned that we need to understand before we figure out what we have to do going forward:

1) Without the government's actions, the collapse of AIG could have caused every major bank in the world to fail.

2) Without the credit default swap market, there's no way banks can report the true value of their assets - they'd all be in default. That's why the government will enact laws that require the suspension of mark-to-market accounting. Essentially, banks will be allowed to pretend they have far higher-quality loans than they actually do. AIG can't cover for them anymore. Our "recovery" plan includes false accounting.

3) Without the huge fraud perpetrated by AIG, the mortgage bubble could have never grown as large as it did. Yes, other factors contributed, like the role of Fannie and Freddie in particular. But the key to enabling the huge global growth in credit during the last decade can be tied directly to AIG's sale of credit default swaps without collateral. This went on for a decade, exacerbating the problem.

I agree with allocating at least 10% of assets toward gold. But a flight to quality means not only gold, but also to well-capitalized market share leaders who are being undeservedly punished. I have my targets, but every individual needs to find their own comfort level.

Lehman and Merill Lynch this morning....

I wrote this in response to a concerned client:

XXXXX, on the contrary. These firms (investment banks, commercial banks, and insurance companies) invested in mortgage-backed securities, thinking they were safe. Little did they know it was just another asset bubble bursting.

Life insurance companies are more conservative by nature, investing premium payments in short- and long-term bonds, and in the case of indexed products, are linked to stock indexes like the S & P 500. With your contracts, if the S & P tanks, you are still guaranteed a 1% floor--which isn't much, but it's better than losing 15% or more, which is what your current stock portfolio is doing. They are able to guarantee the 1% due to options trading, much like they cap you at 15%.

Expect a big loss in the stock market this morning, as this is really, really bad news, but not something I didn't warn you all about several months and years ago. I predicted the real estate bubble, and it's coming to fruition as well. While the more expensive neighborhoods of the bay area are holding up, expect high-end prices to start declining. Manhattanites continue to brag their real estate market has held up, but do you really think that will continue, now that hundreds of billions of dollars are vanishing? Not only are Wall Street bonuses going to disappear at the end of this year, but many investment bankers will be lucky to have jobs. Having a consortium of banks to band together to raise money to prevent the next disaster is akin to gathering 10 cancer victims into a leaky boat--a few will get tossed over the side. First Bear Stearns, Countrywide, now Lehman and Merrill Lynch. Don't forget insolvent Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae, who only hold trillions of dollars of mortgages (70% of all US mortgages). Check out their share prices--they've lost over 90% of their market cap, which makes the tech bubble look like Disneyland.

Expect more big losses and layoffs--it is going to be a bloodbath--the biggest since the Great Depression. Insurance companies were the only ones standing in the aftermath of the Depression, as thousands of banks failed. They set premiums based on actuarial data, not based on speculative lending practices. Banks use 10:1 leverage, which works great in a growing economy, but is terrible in a downturn, as bad loans mount. Expect Washington Mutual to fold, too--unless they get bailed out. It amazes me that people still think banks are safe, despite pervasive evidence to the contrary. How many more banks have to fail before people get it? In any case, insurance companies are forbidden by law to implement that type of leverage.

The VC market has dried up as well--last quarter was the first time ever that there were no IPOs. The liquidity crisis is spreading up and down the food chain--couples with high FICO scores and sizeable assets are having trouble getting financing. Cash is more important than ever, so curb your spending and hoard it. Don't mess around this time, this ride is going to be hell.

In summary, this is EXACTLY what should be doing in a severe downturn, where every asset you turn to is dropping like a Thai thunderstorm downpour. The next 2 (or more years) will be very difficult, and when the last bulls finally turn bearish, basically giving up all hope and expecting the world to end. hopefully we will reach a bottom. Real estate agents and stock brokers have been preaching to me their respective markets will turn around for the last two years, and given their polyannish outlook, I know this hellstorm is going to last longer. They're like Colonel Klink in Hogan's Heroes--whatever they say will happen, do the exact opposite.

If you had to pin me down, the meltdown recovers in 2010, which means you can expect a climactic abyss in stock markets late 2009. THAT will be the time to nibble at good companies who got thrown out with the baby wash--the companies themselves are solid, but the financial hurricane took them down unfairly Pick the winners of each struggling group: Goldman Sachs will be a screaming buy in a couple years, but don't try to catch a falling knife--it'lll cut you. Wait till they bottom and bounce off the bottom a couple times. It's better to be late when bottom-fishing (buying), and it's better to be early when selling.

Of course, I could be wrong and too optimistic on the recovery time, at which point, all bets are off. Just to give you an idea of how bad it is, Warren Buffett of Berkshire Hathaway just sent a directive to one of his portfolio companies, a reinsurer who guarantees funds above the FDIC limit of $100,000 for banks. They lost a mint in guaranteeing losses when IndyMac went under recently, so the reinsurer just notified thousands of banks they are no longer guaranteeing accounts above $100,000! Do you think wealthy depositors are going to react to that?

As an aside, the formerly venerable Lehman firm was the preemiment fixed-income (bond) banker who got themselves in trouble with junk offerings years ago. Buffett actually stepped in and helped bail them out at the time. Obviously, he's not bailing them out this time. These subprime mortgages are the latest cyanide, only this time the Kool-Aid is a lot more toxic. You thought I was a doom and gloomer earlier, and it turns out I understated the magnitude. And unfortunately, it's going to get even worse.